Stop settling for average
If this week’s video struck a nerve, the Insiders Club helps you turn that concern into a practical plan — so you’re prepared for deeper corrections, not reacting after the damage.
This week’s update at a glance
What you’ll learn
Prefer a lighter commitment? Join our $1 trial for 2 weeks to get the weekly deep dive — market commentary, recommendations, sector analysis and education — in Portfolio Analyst. Learn more →
The thinking shift (in plain English)
The biggest trap in periods like this is getting sucked into stories. Bears call every pullback the next 1987 or 2000. Bulls assume every dip will be bought just as aggressively as the last one. Neither camp has a monopoly on the truth — and both tend to speak in absolutes that aren’t helpful for real-world decision making.
My approach is to ignore the narratives and let the market itself set the tone. When leadership is narrowing, volatility is rising and former winners are gapping lower on heavy volume, it’s a signal to respect risk, not a guarantee of a crash. Likewise, a bounce after a rough week only really matters if it shows improving breadth and follow-through, not just a bit of short covering.
You don’t need to know in advance whether we’re facing a “mere” correction or something nastier. What matters is having a plan for both paths: how much you’re prepared to see a position fall before you reduce risk, what you’ll buy if quality stocks get marked down, and how you’ll keep your emotions in check while that plays out.
What history shows (with important caveats)
Historically, major market tops where fundamentals have genuinely cracked don’t arrive with calm, orderly pullbacks. They tend to feature disorderly price action: wide-range candles, repeated gap-downs, failed rallies and heavy distribution across many sectors at once. Credit conditions tighten, earnings expectations roll over and investors are forced to de-risk.
What we’re seeing so far is different. There has been aggressive selling in the high-multiple leaders — especially parts of tech and semiconductors — but smaller companies and some economically sensitive areas have held up better. Indexes like the Russell 2000 haven’t broken down in the same way, which is more consistent with a valuation and leadership reset than the end of the cycle. That can change, but it’s the starting point for how I allocate odds between the two scenarios.
The caveat is important: no historical pattern guarantees the future. Past corrections where earnings stayed resilient have often delivered excellent opportunities for investors who were prepared. Corrections where the fundamentals cracked underneath them have been a very different story. My job is to keep updating the evidence as new data comes in, not to marry a narrative.
Where I’m focused now
Important information
Any advice in this video is general advice only. Neither your personal objectives, financial situation or needs have been taken into consideration. Accordingly you should consider how appropriate the advice (if any) is to those objectives, financial situation and needs, before acting on the advice. Garry Davis (AR No:317590) is an authorised representative of Primary Securities Ltd (AFSL No. 224107).
Note to traders* The publishers of this article/information/promotion wish to disclose that they may hold this stock in their portfolios and that any decision to purchase this stock should be done so after the purchaser has made their own enquiries as to the validity of any information in this article/information/promotion...
To receive notification when my Australian Stock Market Update is posted each weekend, fill out the form on this page or subscribe to my YouTube channel.
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.